Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Doxa Maps
2c397d25ef Source comments state design history and measurements as facts, without quoting or naming anyone
Comments in library/ and internal/ that quoted a person, attributed a decision to one, used first person,
named fleet agents or carried private host names now state the same technical fact in neutral words:
poster-render (including the comments it writes into generated posters), packet-render, the poster and
research scripts, PosterWall, DataTable, the legends, the layouts and the gates. The network-policy note
states the policy itself. Behaviour is unchanged: a few printed gate messages and reason labels drop an
agent name, the poster-render integrity pin follows its comment-only edit, and series.json changes only in
its _meta and _why notes. The historical poster design snapshots (library/scripts/posters/snapshots/),
which nothing reads, are removed.
2026-10-01 00:37:17 +00:00
Doxa Maps
b993bb094b Pin the three layers that make Show on map work on the first click
The composite's first "Show on map" did nothing and only a second click
selected the zone: the list pane dispatched an event at a map pane whose
listener attaches in onMounted, and the pane mounts lazily. That is
fixed on main already -- this is the regression gate it never had.

The fix is three mechanisms, so the gate asserts them separately rather
than asking one "does it work" question that would go green on two of
three. Delivery: the request is written as an attribute before the event
is dispatched, because an element dispatch has no replay and an
attribute is state that survives element upgrade. Arrival: the pane
reads that attribute on mount and observes it afterwards, covering
requests that predate the pane and requests that follow it. Effect: an
arrived request that cannot apply -- because the legend node is not
there yet, or because onLegendSelect refused while the tapestry layer
was down -- is retained and drained at the readiness signal, with the
drain re-checking which request it is draining so a newer selection
cannot be overwritten by an older one.

Mutation-tested per layer, and one mutant escaped first time: there are
TWO retain sites, node-not-found and applied-but-no-selection, and a
single pattern match stayed green while one of them was deleted. They
fail at different layers -- arrival before data versus arrival before
readiness -- so the gate now counts them.

Source-level by design: the race is a lifecycle ordering between two
custom elements, which a DOM-less runner cannot stage. The rendered
check is the browser seat's; what this pins is that none of the three
mechanisms quietly disappears.
2026-09-28 23:23:57 +00:00