Comments in library/ and internal/ that quoted a person, attributed a decision to one, used first person,
named fleet agents or carried private host names now state the same technical fact in neutral words:
poster-render (including the comments it writes into generated posters), packet-render, the poster and
research scripts, PosterWall, DataTable, the legends, the layouts and the gates. The network-policy note
states the policy itself. Behaviour is unchanged: a few printed gate messages and reason labels drop an
agent name, the poster-render integrity pin follows its comment-only edit, and series.json changes only in
its _meta and _why notes. The historical poster design snapshots (library/scripts/posters/snapshots/),
which nothing reads, are removed.
Every reference to the Driver in internal/ is reworded the same way as in
library/: the reason stays, the speaker and the quote go, an open decision
reads "provisional, pending a product decision", and agent names and decision-
sheet rows are dropped. Where a gate printed the word, its message now names
the reviewer or the ruling instead.
Three spots were code, not comments, and changed with their callers:
- the element census's allowlist field `driver` is now `ruling`, in the gate
and both presets (same validation: match, ruling, date and card required);
- check:i18n-never-translated's DRIVER-GATED marker is DECISION-PENDING, in
the entries and in the regex that counts them (its output is otherwise
byte-identical);
- the package.json description of the census says "ruling".
public-hygiene-check keeps its two patterns for the word: they are what keep
it out of the served folder.
rega's census refutes the min-height diagnosis I gave, and the arithmetic is what
settles it. Inside section.dms-pane the CONTENT measures exactly the viewport: 900 in a
794px pane at 1440x900, 844 in a 712px pane at 390x844. The overflow is not "about the
DX-life header", it IS the header -- 106 and 132 px -- and it happens on 12 of 16 tabs
INCLUDING plugins that assert no floor of their own, which is what proves the floor is
not theirs.
library/ProfileLoader.vue:336 floors EVERY profile at
`min-height: var(--profile-min-h, 100dvh)`. That measures against the VIEWPORT while the
pane measures against its HOST, so wherever anything sits above the gallery the profile
is taller than the pane by exactly that chrome, and .dms-pane's overflow-y:auto scrolls
the whole plugin -- tab strip included. ProfileLoader documents the trap and documents
the only lever: the floor is inside the child's SHADOW ROOT, where no host-page selector
reaches, so an inherited custom property is all a host has. `--profile-min-h: 0`.
IT IS TWO THIRDS OF A FIX, NOT A NEW DEFECT. .vtl-host and plugin-studio's .ps-pane
already set it. .dms-pane was copied from .vtl-host -- its own comment says "porting the
same proven shape" -- and took the first two lines: fill the host, own the overflow. The
third, release the child's viewport floor, is the one that makes the other two safe.
So the gate now asserts the THREE AS ONE SHAPE: a rule that is absolutely-filling AND
scrolling must release the floor. It also FAILS if it cannot find such a rule at all,
because a gate that silently stops finding its subject is the failure I spent this
morning removing from check:i18n-keys-exist -- a check that matches nothing reports the
same green as a check that matches everything.
Negative-tested: removing the opt-out from either pane fails it, and changing the pane's
shape so the gate cannot recognise it fails it too rather than passing blind.
MY DIAGNOSIS WAS SECOND-ORDER AND I SHOULD SAY SO PLAINLY. The min-height floors were
real and worth fixing, but they only bite when a plugin's own floor exceeds the pane.
This bites on every tab at every size. I reasoned from source to the first mechanism
that explained the one symptom I had been shown, and the tall-desktop arm -- the one I
asked rega to run precisely because it would refute me -- is what separated them.
The Driver's least favourite bug: on DX Life's research page a capability-4 plugin
with tabs at the top had a second, element-level scrollbar, and scrolling it scrolled
the TAB HEADER out of view.
doxa-maps-spa pins each fixed-viewport plugin with position:absolute;inset:0;height:
100% and its own comment states the invariant: "fills the pane exactly, so
scrollHeight===clientHeight and overflow:auto paints NO scrollbar." CSS never granted
that. A used height is CLAMPED between min-height and max-height, so a child's own
min-height BEATS the height:100% the shell sets -- it is a floor, not a preference.
Wherever the pane was shorter than that floor the pinned element grew taller than the
pane it was meant to fill, .dms-slot grew with it, and .dms-pane's overflow-y:auto
became a real scroll container wrapping the WHOLE plugin, tab strip included. That is
the second scrollbar: not the plugin's content scroller, the PANE scrolling the plugin
bodily. The invariant was written as a description and was only ever a hope.
The shell now pins with min-height:0. An inline style outranks a child's :host rule,
so that one property restores the invariant for every fixed-viewport plugin at once
without editing any of them. It is NOT added to the scroll-stack branch, where
natural height is the design.
A floor set INSIDE a child's shadow root is out of reach from the shell, and two of
mine had one. research-dashboard's .rd-shell and big-picture's .bp-root now say
min-height:inherit, deferring to :host -- which the gallery pins to 0, and which a
naive page leaves at its own floor, so the collapse guard those floors exist for is
kept rather than deleted. big-picture's 480px MOVED UP to :host rather than being
dropped: :host had no floor there, so inheriting would have quietly resolved to 0
everywhere and thrown away the black-screen guard its own comment calls load-bearing.
check-one-scroll-container asserts both halves, because either alone rots: the shell
still pins with min-height:0, and no plugin grows a NEW floor inside its shadow root.
The second half is what matters later -- a fixed shell plus a plugin that adds
min-height:700px next month is this bug again and nobody would connect it.
The rule is a CONTRADICTION IN ONE DECLARATION, not a large min-height by itself: an
element saying height:100% ("I fill whatever holds me") while refusing to be shorter
than N. My first version flagged any big min-height and caught gospel-resources'
.gd-map, a map deliberately sized height:80svh that scrolls inside its root's own
content scroller -- the one scrollbar a plugin is allowed. Flagging it would have sent
its owner after a non-bug, which is worse than not having the gate.
Negative-tested: removing min-height:0 from the shell, and reverting either .rd-shell
or .bp-root to a constant, each add a failure; restored, only the known one remains.
RED ON PURPOSE, and deliberately NOT in gates:pre. gospel-internet's .gb still carries
min-height:640px and that fix is its owner's. Wiring a red gate into gates:pre would
block the fleet on someone else's file, so the gates:pre entry belongs in the same
landing that fixes .gb -- until then this gate is the work item, afterwards the guard.
Source only: doxa-maps-spa, research-dashboard and big-picture need rebuilding, which
is the build owner's to do.
