Comments in library/ and internal/ that quoted a person, attributed a decision to one, used first person,
named fleet agents or carried private host names now state the same technical fact in neutral words:
poster-render (including the comments it writes into generated posters), packet-render, the poster and
research scripts, PosterWall, DataTable, the legends, the layouts and the gates. The network-policy note
states the policy itself. Behaviour is unchanged: a few printed gate messages and reason labels drop an
agent name, the poster-render integrity pin follows its comment-only edit, and series.json changes only in
its _meta and _why notes. The historical poster design snapshots (library/scripts/posters/snapshots/),
which nothing reads, are removed.
Every reference to the Driver in internal/ is reworded the same way as in
library/: the reason stays, the speaker and the quote go, an open decision
reads "provisional, pending a product decision", and agent names and decision-
sheet rows are dropped. Where a gate printed the word, its message now names
the reviewer or the ruling instead.
Three spots were code, not comments, and changed with their callers:
- the element census's allowlist field `driver` is now `ruling`, in the gate
and both presets (same validation: match, ruling, date and card required);
- check:i18n-never-translated's DRIVER-GATED marker is DECISION-PENDING, in
the entries and in the regex that counts them (its output is otherwise
byte-identical);
- the package.json description of the census says "ruling".
public-hygiene-check keeps its two patterns for the word: they are what keep
it out of the served folder.
ShareButton is not a .mcb. It wraps its button in a .share-wrap div carrying
border-radius:50% and a conic-gradient ring on ::before at inset:-2px, so the
button rules missed it and it kept a round rainbow halo inside the square
panel -- breaking the single-card illusion at the corner the eye lands on.
rega measured it at 390 and asked whether square should flatten it. It
should: in this variant the panel owns the outline, so a child may not bring
its own. The round default is untouched.
Gated, with a control asserting ShareButton really does carry a 50% radius,
so the two rules are not decorative.
A media query adds no specificity. The mobile block's
`.map-toolbar { gap: 6px }` is (0,1,0) exactly like
`.map-toolbar--square { gap: 0 }`, and it comes later in the sheet, so it
won: on every phone a square toolbar fell back to separate buttons inside
one ringed panel. The shape broke precisely where the Driver is most likely
to look at it.
The --no-geocoder pair is (0,2,0) and outranked the variant whatever the
order, so it needs the two-class answer.
This is the same lesson as the goal cards' gap-vs-margin: a ported mechanism
is only ported if it still WINS, and specificity is the part that decides
whether it does. Found by following the phone thread rather than by looking
at the variant again.
check:square-map-controls now asserts the override is inside the mobile
block, that the two-class form answers --no-geocoder, and -- as a control --
that the base rule really does come first, which is why the override is
needed at all. Removing it turns the gate red.
The CSS comment explaining it cost one more mistake: I wrote the selectors
in backticks, inside the template literal that holds the stylesheet. A
backtick ends the literal, which is the trap check:sfc-parse names in its own
failure text, and it caught me with it.
check:square-map-controls, registered with a gates:post token.
It reads node_modules/maplibre-gl/dist/maplibre-gl.css and compares our
ported values against THAT FILE rather than against a remembered number,
which is possible only because the look the Driver asked for is the engine
default: DX-life adds NavigationControl and overrides nothing, so the target
is published.
It asserts the three deliberate deviations as deviations -- the engine's
29px is not adopted, there is no overflow:hidden, and a forced-colors block
ships -- so each stays a stated choice rather than decaying into a mistake
nobody can see.
And it asserts the blast radius: round is the default and none of the nine
MapToolbar consumers passes controls=. Opting demo-map in turns it red,
which is what makes the silence mean something.
Its CSS assertions read the text passed to useShadowStyles, not the file.
The first run went red on "we do not adopt 29px" because the prop's own doc
comment quotes the engine's rule, 29px and all -- a checker that cannot tell
a comment from a declaration keeps finding the documentation it stands on.
