A LIVE WRONG NUMBER, not a future risk. The universal `list` prop is already on
main (e3d25ff6) and this profile already honours it — applyPeopleGroupList()
filters the rows at all four fetch sites, packetRecords included — and the
membership files are on disk. So under ?list=frontier-500k the packet's rows were
the 71 network groups that are Project 700, while the funnel took its denominator
from the last step of vision-funnel.json and printed "of the 2,107". Off by a
factor of 30, with nothing on the page looking broken.
Measured from data/people-groups/lists/*.json (counts.doxa, what a Tier A map
shows): frontier-500k 71 · frontier 1,745 · unengaged 1,929 · unreached 2,082 ·
the default 2,107.
THREE NUMBERS WERE WRONG, NOT ONE, because all three descended from one total:
the share's denominator; the footnote's "N are in no list" (total minus assigned);
and "1 of 27 lists", which is a property of the UPG-100 ZONE CATALOGUE, not of the
active list — the zones partition the default list and nothing else.
A non-default list now gets its own step, labelled with the list's own label, so
the narrowing does not jump from one list's total to another list's packet.
AND EACH CLAUSE IS SUPPRESSED SEPARATELY, because they are provable separately.
A first pass dropped the whole share line whenever listCount was absent, throwing
away a true statement ("5.4% of the 1,745") to avoid an unprovable one. The
footnote splits the same way: provenance holds for every list, coverage does not.
⚠ The footnote is NOT split by parsing the translated sentence — hi ends in "।"
and zh in "。", and reading translated prose for structure is the trap
check-packet-render's own comment warns about. It is a second key.
⚠ And `funnel.unassigned ?? 0` would have printed "0 of the 1,745 are not yet in
any list" — a confident falsehood whose zero reads as a completeness claim.
── AND THREE FINDINGS FROM rega'S RENDER, none of which I could see ──────────
"0 people" PRINTED ON THE READER'S ROW OF EVERY PACKET. Number(null) is 0 (only
Number(undefined) is NaN), so `Number.isFinite(Number(x))` admitted the
deliberate `population: null` marker as the number zero. I asked "is this a
finite number?" when the question was "did anyone give me a population?" — the
same presence-vs-value confusion as inferring "did it work" from a field that
answers "did it isolate". Zero is suppressed too: a people group with no people
is missing data wearing a number's clothes.
THE SHARE LINE READ AS PART OF THE FOOTNOTE. Measured: 218px below the reader's
row, 42px above the footnote, because the last row kept the full inter-row gap.
Proximity is the only thing grouping them, so an even gap grouped the share with
the wrong element. The last row's margin is now 14px: share 14px under its row,
288px clear of the footnote.
THE GATE ASSERTED PAGE 2 AND PRINTED NOTHING ABOUT IT. rega: "a reader cannot see
WHAT it asserted." A silent pass is the mirror of a printed-but-unasserted number
— the check is real and the evidence invisible. It now reports rows, bars and the
share line, and gained two assertions: every row must have a BAR (the reader's
step had none, so the funnel never visibly narrowed to "yours"), and no row may
print a zero population.
Verified: all five list cases render their own true numbers — doxa keeps the full
claim, unreached/frontier/unengaged get their own step and a percentage with no
false "1 of K", frontier-500k reads "100% of the 71" with the duplicate row
suppressed (a step that repeats its neighbour is not a step). The four fixtures
are byte-for-byte unchanged on the default path, so the list-awareness is purely
additive. check:packet-strings-parity PASS with the three new keys. Both new gate
assertions mutation-tested in en and ar: removing a bar is DETECTED, injecting a
zero population is DETECTED. 5 rows = 5 bars, 0 zero-population rows, "0 people"
absent. Six-row layout recomputed: fits with 318px headroom, 206px if every label
wraps. BUNDLE=my-upg-100-list vite build clean.
NOT re-rendered in a browser: rega measured the previous state and these are
responses to it, so the new geometry wants one more look.
127a2e0930