The map got coordinates and a language code by matching each group's NAME
against the pin dataset. That left 285 unplaceable and, worse, unsearchable: no
ISO code is no key to look them up by in any pool, so the access table could only
report them as "not searched" — nobody had been able to ask.
Doxa's own per-group endpoint carries both, and their robots.txt disallows
nothing. /api/people-groups/detail/<slug> gives primary_language and latitude and
longitude for every one: Akha to ahk, Akeu to byo, Alxa Mongols to xal, Ajja to
krs — four the name join had failed. So the name matching is not improved, it is
REMOVED. It was always a guess wearing a join's clothes: Akha in Laos sat beside
Akha Jipea, Akha Jaweuy and Akha Piso in the pins, and any pick among them would
have invented a language for a people. The publisher saying which language their
group speaks ends the guessing.
2,107 of 2,107 placed. Zero without a language code. The "not searched" rung is
gone from the access ladder because nothing is unsearched any more.
The gap grows 281 to 381, and that is the point: those 100 groups were always
without the gospel in their language, and the map could not say so because it did
not know what their language was.
The fetcher runs its controls in band both ways before trusting a record — a real
slug must return a language and coordinates, an impossible one must not — so a
site answering 200 with an empty body could not fill this table with silence.
IMB's own access and engagement fields come along beside ours, never merged into
them, because where two sources disagree that disagreement is worth seeing.
26cd737587