For 230 people groups the map said "nothing found" and stopped, when
that was not the whole truth: a language already spoken widely in
their country does have Scripture or the film. Kimr in Sudan has
nothing in Assangori; Sudanese Arabic, spoken by 65 groups around
them, has both. That is the difference between no way in and a way in
that is not their heart language.
WORDED SO IT CANNOT BE SKIMMED AS "THEY HAVE SCRIPTURE". The heading
says "Not their language", the body names whose language it is and how
widely it is spoken, the strength is quoted from the source, and the
last line says a second language is a way in and not a translation.
The chips above are untouched and still read "none found" five times,
and the tier is unchanged: 2,001 groups still have nothing of their
own, exactly as before.
Two exclusions, both measured rather than assumed. Fourteen of these
rows offer a DEAF people group a SPOKEN bridge — Gawri "has a film" is
no use to Deaf Pakistanis, the same error as offering them recorded
audio — so sign languages are out. Sixty-five carry the curated
strength "weak — may not be a real lingua franca"; a bridge the source
itself doubts is not an answer, so those are out too.
Placed below the whole chip row after a first pass split it, leaving
the Zume chip stranded under the panel.
d55285eafe