Last tick left 547 Scripture links with no scope and 24 with no name. Both had a cause
worth finding rather than papering over.
★ THE 547 WERE A PATCH THAT SILENTLY DID NOTHING. Two code paths create an eBible entry.
The edit that added `ss` matched a string containing httpsify(ee.u); the second path reads
`s: ee.u` without it, so the replacement found no match, reported success, and changed
nothing. 523 entries kept a title and a full-Bible flag while losing their scope — a
half-applied change is harder to see than a failed one, because every field you happen to
check is present. That branch now sets every field the other branch sets.
Scope coverage 690 -> 1,213.
THE 24 POINT AT AN OLDER EDITION than the catalogue's current pick — tel2010 where the
catalogue says tel2017, ben2006 where it says benobcv. BOTH RESOLVE, checked 8 of 8 at
200, so the curated choice is a choice and fill-never-overwrite keeps it. What was missing
was only the description, and the language index cannot supply it: it answers "the best
translation for this code", not "what is THIS link". The catalogue is now also indexed BY
URL, 1,545 entries, so a link is described by the edition it actually points to. Telugu
keeps ebible.org/tel2010/ and is now named "Telugu Easy Reading Version — Full Bible".
RESULT: 1,237 of 1,237 Scripture links carry a real translation name and a scope. Zero
rows still read "Scripture in this language". 840 New Testament, 251 Portions of both
Testaments, 132 Full Bible, 14 Old Testament.
The 2,311 blank scopes in the table reconcile exactly — 2,087 film, 121 Bible Stories and
103 Door43 Scripture entries, which are not eBible publications and have no book counts to
scope. Blank there is the honest answer, not a gap.
Verified: the scope line renders on a real group and is ABSENT on a group with no
Scripture, so it still discriminates; coverage gate passes; pins, table and deep-link
probes pass.
91dc9e6b33