The same drift has now appeared six times, each spelled differently:
negated fields on a line naming "none", a positive hasAny over a
mapped row, a predicate inside a build script, and — found this tick —
a pair of columns no pass had ever touched. A source-level pattern has
to guess how the next one will be written.
Clause N does not guess. It compares the shipped ANSWER against the
pin tier, so it catches the seventh however it is phrased. Measured
when written: people-group-resources.any_resource_found disagreed with
the tier on 194 rows, and its no_resource_found pair contradicted
ITSELF on 7 more, because neither column was in the refresh at all.
Both now move together, 195 and 202 corrected, and the table agrees
with the tier on all 2,103 judgeable rows.
A code with no pin is SKIPPED, not guessed. The tier lives on pins, so
an unpinned code cannot be judged this way — judging it anyway
reported ajp as a defect on the first run, when the row was right and
the check was wrong. That is the failure this repo keeps meeting, so
it is written into the clause rather than left as a comment.
Also corrected there: the table's own note still told readers GRN
answers 403 to every request and had never been searched.
cc3ab8b822